Taking y=y0, we see that the morphism αX,Y,ZSets, acts on elements as

αX,Y,ZSets,(x(y0z))=def(xy0)z.

However, by the definition of , we have xy0=xy0 for all x,xX, preventing αX,Y,ZSets, from being non-invertible.

Firstly, note that, given (X,x0),(Y,y0),(Z,z0)Obj(Sets), the map

αX,Y,ZSets,:X(YZ)(XY)Z

is indeed a morphism of pointed sets, as we have

αX,Y,ZSets,(x0(y0z0))=(x0y0)z0.

Next, we claim that αSets, is a natural transformation. We need to show that, given morphisms of pointed sets

f:(X,x0)(X,x0),g:(Y,y0)(Y,y0),h:(Z,z0)(Z,z0)

the diagram

commutes. Indeed, this diagram acts on elements as

and hence indeed commutes, showing αSets, to be a natural transformation. This finishes the proof.


Noticed something off, or have any comments? Feel free to reach out!


You can also use the contact form below: