We have a natural identification1

\[ \webleft\{ \begin{gathered} \text{Monads in}\\ \text{$\textbf{Rel}$ on $A$} \end{gathered} \webright\} \cong \webleft\{ \text{Preorders on $A$}\webright\} . \]


1See also for an extension of this correspondence to “relative monads in $\textbf{Rel}$”.

A monad in $\textbf{Rel}$ on $A$ consists of a relation $R\colon A\mathrel {\rightarrow \kern -9.5pt\mathrlap {|}\kern 6pt}A$ together with maps

\begin{align*} \mu _{R} & \colon R\mathbin {\diamond }R \subset R,\\ \eta _{R} & \colon \chi _{A} \subset R \end{align*}

making the diagrams

commute. However, since all morphisms involved are inclusions, the commutativity of the above diagrams is automatic, and hence all that is left is the data of the two maps $\mu _{R}$ and $\eta _{R}$, which correspond respectively to the following conditions:
  1. For each $a,b,c\in A$, if $a\sim _{R}b$ and $b\sim _{R}c$, then $a\sim _{R}c$.
  2. For each $a\in A$, we have $a\sim _{R}a$.
These are exactly the requirements for $R$ to be a preorder (). Conversely, any preorder $\preceq $ gives rise to a pair of maps $\mu _{\preceq }$ and $\eta _{\preceq }$, forming a monad on $A$.


Noticed something off, or have any comments? Feel free to reach out!


You can also use the contact form below: