4.2.5 Equalisers

Let f,g:(X,x0)(Y,y0) be morphisms of pointed sets.

The equaliser of (f,g) is the pair consisting of:

  • The Limit. The pointed set (Eq(f,g),x0).
  • The Cone. The morphism of pointed sets

    eq(f,g):(Eq(f,g),x0)(X,x0)

    given by the canonical inclusion eq(f,g)Eq(f,g)X.

We claim that (Eq(f,g),x0) is the categorical equaliser of f and g in Sets. First we need to check that the relevant equaliser diagram commutes, i.e. that we have

feq(f,g)=geq(f,g),

which indeed holds by the definition of the set Eq(f,g). Next, we prove that Eq(f,g) satisfies the universal property of the equaliser. Suppose we have a diagram of the form

in Sets. Then there exists a unique morphism of pointed sets

ϕ:(E,)(Eq(f,g),x0)

making the diagram

commute, being uniquely determined by the condition

eq(f,g)ϕ=e

via

ϕ(x)=e(x)

for each xE, where we note that e(x)A indeed lies in Eq(f,g) by the condition

fe=ge,

which gives

f(e(x))=g(e(x))

for each xE, so that e(x)Eq(f,g). Lastly, we note that ϕ is indeed a morphism of pointed sets, as we have

ϕ()=e()=x0,

where we have used that e is a morphism of pointed sets.

Let (X,x0) and (Y,y0) be pointed sets and let f,g,h:(X,x0)(Y,y0) be morphisms of pointed sets.

  1. 1. Associativity. We have isomorphisms of pointed sets
    Eq(feq(g,h),geq(g,h))=Eq(feq(g,h),heq(g,h))Eq(f,g,h)Eq(feq(f,g),heq(f,g))=Eq(geq(f,g),heq(f,g)),

    where Eq(f,g,h) is the limit of the diagram

    in Sets, being explicitly given by

    Eq(f,g,h){aA | f(a)=g(a)=h(a)}.
  2. 2. Unitality. We have an isomorphism of pointed sets
    Eq(f,f)X.
  3. 3. Commutativity. We have an isomorphism of pointed sets
    Eq(f,g)Eq(g,f).


Noticed something off, or have any comments? Feel free to reach out!


You can also use the contact form below: