The cotrivial relation on $A$ and $B$ is the relation $\mathord {\sim }_{\mathrm{cotriv}}$ defined equivalently as follows:

  1. As a subset of $A\times B$, we have
    \[ \mathord {\sim }_{\mathrm{cotriv}}\mathrel {\smash {\overset {\mathclap {\scriptscriptstyle \text{def}}}=}}\emptyset . \]
  2. As a function from $A\times B$ to $\{ \mathsf{true},\mathsf{false}\} $, the relation $\mathord {\sim }_{\mathrm{cotriv}}$ is the constant function
    \[ \Delta _{\mathsf{false}}\colon A\times B\to \{ \mathsf{true},\mathsf{false}\} \]

    from $A\times B$ to $\{ \mathsf{true},\mathsf{false}\} $ taking the value $\mathsf{false}$.

  3. As a function from $A$ to $\mathcal{P}\webleft (B\webright )$, the relation $\mathord {\sim }_{\mathrm{cotriv}}$ is the function
    \[ \Delta _{\mathsf{false}}\colon A\to \mathcal{P}\webleft (B\webright ) \]

    defined by

    \[ \Delta _{\mathsf{false}}\webleft (a\webright )\mathrel {\smash {\overset {\mathclap {\scriptscriptstyle \text{def}}}=}}\emptyset \]

    for each $a\in A$.

  4. Lastly, it is the unique relation $R$ on $A$ and $B$ such that we have $a\nsim _{R}b$ for each $a\in A$ and each $b\in B$.


Noticed something off, or have any comments? Feel free to reach out!


You can also use the contact form below: