The symmetry of the product of sets is the natural isomorphism

whose component

σX,YSets:X×YY×X

at X,YObj(Sets) is defined by

σX,YSets(x,y)=def(y,x)

for each (x,y)X×Y.

Invertibility
The inverse of σX,YSets is the morphism

σX,YSets,1:Y×XX×Y

defined by

σX,YSets,1(y,x)=def(x,y)

for each (y,x)Y×X. Indeed:

  • Invertibility I. We have

    [σX,YSets,1σX,YSets](x,y)=defσX,YSets,1(σX,YSets(x,y))=defσX,YSets,1(y,x)=def(x,y)=def[idX×Y](x,y)

    for each (x,y)X×Y, and therefore we have

    σX,YSets,1σX,YSets=idX×Y.

  • Invertibility II. We have

    [σX,YSetsσX,YSets,1](y,x)=defσX,YSets,1(σX,YSets(y,x))=defσX,YSets,1(x,y)=def(y,x)=def[idY×X](y,x)

    for each (y,x)Y×X, and therefore we have

    σX,YSetsσX,YSets,1=idY×X.

Therefore σX,YSets is indeed an isomorphism.

Naturality
We need to show that, given functions

f:XA,g:YB

the diagram

commutes. Indeed, this diagram acts on elements as

and hence indeed commutes, showing σSets to be a natural transformation.

Being a Natural Isomorphism
Since σSets is natural and σSets,1 is a componentwise inverse to σSets, it follows from Chapter 9: Categories, Item 2 of Proposition 9.9.7.1.2 that σSets,1 is also natural. Thus σSets is a natural isomorphism.


Noticed something off, or have any comments? Feel free to reach out!


You can also use the contact form below: