9.6.1 Faithful Functors

Let $\mathcal{C}$ and $\mathcal{D}$ be categories.

A functor $F\colon \mathcal{C}\to \mathcal{D}$ is faithful if, for each $A,B\in \text{Obj}\webleft (\mathcal{C}\webright )$, the action on morphisms

\[ F_{A,B} \colon \textup{Hom}_{\mathcal{C}}\webleft (A,B\webright ) \to \textup{Hom}_{\mathcal{D}}\webleft (F_{A},F_{B}\webright ) \]

of $F$ at $\webleft (A,B\webright )$ is injective.

Let $F\colon \mathcal{C}\to \mathcal{D}$ and $G\colon \mathcal{D}\to \mathcal{E}$ be functors.

  1. Interaction With Composition. If $F$ and $G$ are faithful, then so is $G\circ F$.
  2. Interaction With Postcomposition. The following conditions are equivalent:
    1. The functor $F\colon \mathcal{C}\to \mathcal{D}$ is faithful.
    2. For each $\mathcal{X}\in \text{Obj}\webleft (\mathsf{Cats}\webright )$, the postcomposition functor
      \[ F_{*} \colon \mathsf{Fun}\webleft (\mathcal{X},\mathcal{C}\webright ) \to \mathsf{Fun}\webleft (\mathcal{X},\mathcal{D}\webright ) \]

      is faithful.

    3. The functor $F\colon \mathcal{C}\to \mathcal{D}$ is a representably faithful morphism in $\mathsf{Cats}_{\mathsf{2}}$ in the sense of Chapter 11: Types of Morphisms in Bicategories, Definition 11.1.1.1.1.
  3. Interaction With Precomposition I. Let $F\colon \mathcal{C}\to \mathcal{D}$ be a functor.
    1. If $F$ is faithful, then the precomposition functor
      \[ F^{*} \colon \mathsf{Fun}\webleft (\mathcal{D},\mathcal{X}\webright ) \to \mathsf{Fun}\webleft (\mathcal{C},\mathcal{X}\webright ) \]

      can fail to be faithful.

    2. Conversely, if the precomposition functor
      \[ F^{*} \colon \mathsf{Fun}\webleft (\mathcal{D},\mathcal{X}\webright ) \to \mathsf{Fun}\webleft (\mathcal{C},\mathcal{X}\webright ) \]

      is faithful, then $F$ can fail to be faithful.

  4. Interaction With Precomposition II. If $F$ is essentially surjective, then the precomposition functor
    \[ F^{*} \colon \mathsf{Fun}\webleft (\mathcal{D},\mathcal{X}\webright ) \to \mathsf{Fun}\webleft (\mathcal{C},\mathcal{X}\webright ) \]

    is faithful.

  5. Interaction With Precomposition III. The following conditions are equivalent:
    1. For each $\mathcal{X}\in \text{Obj}\webleft (\mathsf{Cats}\webright )$, the precomposition functor
      \[ F^{*} \colon \mathsf{Fun}\webleft (\mathcal{D},\mathcal{X}\webright ) \to \mathsf{Fun}\webleft (\mathcal{C},\mathcal{X}\webright ) \]

      is faithful.

    2. For each $\mathcal{X}\in \text{Obj}\webleft (\mathsf{Cats}\webright )$, the precomposition functor
      \[ F^{*} \colon \mathsf{Fun}\webleft (\mathcal{D},\mathcal{X}\webright ) \to \mathsf{Fun}\webleft (\mathcal{C},\mathcal{X}\webright ) \]

      is conservative.

    3. For each $\mathcal{X}\in \text{Obj}\webleft (\mathsf{Cats}\webright )$, the precomposition functor
      \[ F^{*} \colon \mathsf{Fun}\webleft (\mathcal{D},\mathcal{X}\webright ) \to \mathsf{Fun}\webleft (\mathcal{C},\mathcal{X}\webright ) \]

      is monadic.

    4. The functor $F\colon \mathcal{C}\to \mathcal{D}$ is a corepresentably faithful morphism in $\mathsf{Cats}_{\mathsf{2}}$ in the sense of Chapter 11: Types of Morphisms in Bicategories, Definition 11.2.1.1.1.
    5. The components
      \[ \eta _{G}\colon G\Longrightarrow \text{Ran}_{F}\webleft (G\circ F\webright ) \]

      of the unit

      \[ \eta \colon \text{id}_{\mathsf{Fun}\webleft (\mathcal{D},\mathcal{X}\webright )}\Longrightarrow \text{Ran}_{F}\circ F^{*} \]

      of the adjunction $F^{*}\dashv \text{Ran}_{F}$ are all monomorphisms.

    6. The components
      \[ \epsilon _{G}\colon \text{Lan}_{F}\webleft (G\circ F\webright )\Longrightarrow G \]

      of the counit

      \[ \epsilon \colon \text{Lan}_{F}\circ F^{*}\Longrightarrow \text{id}_{\mathsf{Fun}\webleft (\mathcal{D},\mathcal{X}\webright )} \]

      of the adjunction $\text{Lan}_{F}\dashv F^{*}$ are all epimorphisms.

    7. The functor $F$ is dominant (Definition 9.7.1.1.1), i.e. every object of $\mathcal{D}$ is a retract of some object in $\mathrm{Im}\webleft (F\webright )$:
      • For each $B\in \text{Obj}\webleft (\mathcal{D}\webright )$, there exist:
        • An object $A$ of $\mathcal{C}$;
        • A morphism $s\colon B\to F\webleft (A\webright )$ of $\mathcal{D}$;
        • A morphism $r\colon F\webleft (A\webright )\to B$ of $\mathcal{D}$;
        such that $r\circ s=\text{id}_{B}$.

Item 1: Interaction With Composition
Since the map
\[ \webleft (G\circ F\webright )_{A,B} \colon \textup{Hom}_{\mathcal{C}}\webleft (A,B\webright ) \to \textup{Hom}_{\mathcal{D}}\webleft (G_{F_{A}},G_{F_{B}}\webright ), \]

defined as the composition

\[ \textup{Hom}_{\mathcal{C}}\webleft (A,B\webright )\xrightarrow {F_{A,B}}\textup{Hom}_{\mathcal{D}}\webleft (F_{A},F_{B}\webright )\xrightarrow {G_{F\webleft (A\webright ),F\webleft (B\webright )}}\textup{Hom}_{\mathcal{D}}\webleft (G_{F_{A}},G_{F_{B}}\webright ), \]

is a composition of injective functions, it follows from that it is also injective. Therefore $G\circ F$ is faithful.

Item 2: Interaction With Postcomposition
Omitted.
Item 3: Interaction With Precomposition I
See [MSE 733163] for Item (a). Item (b) follows from Item 4 and the fact that there are essentially surjective functors that are not faithful.
Item 4: Interaction With Precomposition II
Omitted, but see https://unimath.github.io/doc/UniMath/d4de26f//UniMath.CategoryTheory.precomp_fully_faithful.html for a formalised proof.
Item 5: Interaction With Precomposition III
We claim Item (a), Item (b), Item (c), Item (d), Item (e), Item (f), and Item (g) are equivalent: This finishes the proof.


Noticed something off, or have any comments? Feel free to reach out!


You can also use the contact form below: